EU Anti Tax Avoidance Package

The Package

The EU Anti Tax Avoidance Package contains measures for:

• Effective taxation whereby all companies pay taxes where they make their profits;
• Tax transparency so that Member States have the information needed to ensure fair taxation;
• Addressing the risk of double taxation so that companies which pay their fair share of taxes are not penalised for making use of the EU’s internal market.

New proposals include measures to block the most common methods used to avoid paying tax, tax treaty abuse prevention, exchange of tax-related information on multinationals operating in the EU between Member States, actions to promote tax good governance internationally and a new, unified list of third countries that refuse to play fair.

There are four key elements to the Package:

I. Anti Tax Avoidance Directive

The Anti Tax Avoidance Directive sets out six legally binding anti-avoidance measures, which EU Member States should apply, to counter-act some of the most common types of aggressive tax planning:

• Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC) rule to deter profit shifting to no or low tax countries;
• Switchover rule to prevent double non-taxation of certain income;
• Exit Taxation rule to prevent companies from re-locating assets purely to avoid taxation;
• Interest Limitation rule to discourage companies from creating artificial debt arrangements designed to minimise taxes;
• Hybrids to prevent companies from exploiting national mismatches to avoid taxation;
• General Anti-Abuse rule to counter-act aggressive tax planning when other rules do not apply.

In light of the Exit Taxation rules, an arm’s length (market) value of the intangibles will be taken into account when taxing the assets transferred to other countries. RoyaltyRange database contains premium quality information on arm’s length intellectual property transferring and licensing arrangements in all industry sectors, and is fully compliant with the upcoming EU regulations.

II. Recommendation on Tax Treaties

This Recommendation advices the Member States on how to introduce a general anti-abuse rule in their tax treaties in a way that is EU-law compliant and without hampering the freedom of establishment in the Single Market. This measure is directed to counter corporate tax avoidance by the so called “treaty shopping”.

Member States are also encouraged to revise their definition of permanent establishment (PE) in line with the wording agreed in BEPS. This measure aims to tackle the current situation, whereby sometimes the weaknesses in the PE definition are exploited to avoid having a taxable presence in one or more countries where they are active.

III. Revised Administrative Cooperation Directive

A revision of the Administrative Cooperation Directive will introduce country-by-country reporting between tax authorities on key tax-related information on multinationals.

Following this measure, the parent company of a multinational group (or an appointed subsidiary) will have to provide specific information on the whole group to the tax authorities in the Member State where it is resident. The company will also have to identify all countries in which the group is present for tax purposes and the activities carried out in each of them. The report will then be automatically sent to the tax authorities in every Member State where the multinational group is resident or liable for tax.

This guidance is in line and follows the OECD BEPS Action 13, which proposes a three-tiered approach to transfer pricing documentation‎: master file, country file and country-by-country report. Country-by-country report will provide information on such entities as R&D or IP holding, whereas master file will provide a detailed list of intangibles or groups of intangibles; list of important agreements related to intangibles, including cost contribution arrangements, principle research service agreements and licence agreements; general description of the group’s transfer pricing policies related to R&D and intangibles; and a description of any important transfers of interests in intangibles, including compensation involved.

RoyaltyRange data becomes instrumental to multinationals for implementation, testing and compliance purposes‎. Consistency, reliability and quality are key in this unprecedented compliance and transparency landscape.

IV. Communication on External Strategy

The Strategy sets the path for a clear, consistent and effective EU approach to promote tax good governance globally and respond to external tax avoidance threats. The main elements are:

Updated tax good governance criteria that reflect the new global standard for tax transparency and the OECD BEPS measures for fair tax competition;